The Director Of Income Tax v. Dwarkabai Trust, Mumbai
High Court
20 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax v. Dwarkabai Trust, Mumbai
Date of order
20 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax v. Dwarkabai Trust, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, both the Appeals stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.564 OF 2000
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.564 OF 2000
WITH
WITH
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.565 OF 2000
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.565 OF 2000
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.565 OF 2000
The Director of Income Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
Dwarkabai Trust, Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr.R.A.Vaishampayan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 20th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. On 17.7.2008 these Appeals were adjourned to
24.7.2008 to enable the learned Advocate for the
Appellants to file vakalatnama and to serve the
Respondents. Again on 24.7.2008 two weeks time was
granted and the Appeals came to be adjourned to
7.8.2008.
2. Even on 7.8.2008, as a last chance both the Appeals
were adjourned to 14.8.2008 as the vakalatnama was not
filed on behalf of the Appellants and the Respondents
were not served. However, on that day, it was made
clear that in the event of the failure on the part of
the Appellants to file the vakalatnama and to serve the
Respondents, the Court would be constrained to dismiss
the Appeals. Inspite of the same, the vakalatnama has
not been filed on behalf of the Appellants till date,
and no steps whatsoever have been taken to serve the
Respondents. Hence, both the Appeals stand dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.