Case Law › High Court › The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S. Manee...

The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S. Maneesh Dungarwal

High Court 26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

26 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S. Maneesh Dungarwal, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: PC : failure to pay the costs within stipulated period, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution. the office objections, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4105 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1952 OF 2007 The Director of Income Tax. ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Maneesh Dungarwal. ..Respondent. Mrs. P.P. Bhosale with Mr. B.M.Chatterji andP.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY,2008. PC : failure to pay the costs within stipulated period, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution. the office objections, appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution. 3. It is open to the revenue to recover the costs to bepaid from the officers concerned, if it is found that delay in filing the appeal was caused on account of their negligence. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.