Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Set Sa...

The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Set Satellite (Singapore) P Ltd

High Court 15 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Set Satellite (Singapore) P Ltd
Date of order
15 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Set Satellite (Singapore) P Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the appeals stand dismissed in limini.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 298 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 301 OF 2008 The Director of Income Tax Vs. M/s Set Satellite (Singapore) P Ltd ..Appellant ..Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 299 OF 2008WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 300 OF 2008 The Director of Income Tax ..AppellantVs.M/s Subtec Middle East Ltd ..Respondent ..Respondent Mr. Parag Vyas a/w P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b PDS Legal for the Respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR ,JJ. 15[th] June,2009 DATE : P.C. Both parties fairly state that the issue involved in the present appeals has already been considered and answered by the Division Bench of this Court in the case The Director of Income Tax Vs. M/s NGC Network Asia LLC, in Income Tax Appeal No. 1037 of 2008 decided on 14[th] January, 2009 (unreported). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in these appeals. Hence, the appeals stand dismissed in limini. No order as to costs. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan