The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.ballast Ham Dredging B.v
High Court
15 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.ballast Ham Dredging B.v
Date of order
15 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.ballast Ham Dredging B.v, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3822 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.980 OF 2008
The Director of Income Tax
Vs.M/s.Ballast Ham Dredging B.V.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Mr.A.K.Jasani for theRespondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2008P.C..Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking thecondonation of 54 days’ delay in filing the aboveAppeal. Perused the Notice of Motion andAffidavit-in-support thereof. Sufficient cause ismade out for condoning the delay. There is no case ofinaction negligence or want of bonafide on the part ofthe Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is madeabsolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue