Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.durgad...

The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.durgadevi Sharma

High Court 30 Jun 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.durgadevi Sharma
Date of order
30 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
1985-86
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.durgadevi Sharma, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.110 OF 2008 The Director of Income Tax..Appellant Vs. M/s.Durgadevi Sharma .........Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ.DATED: 30TH JUNE, 2008 CORAM: F.I. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATED: 30TH JUNE, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: . The I.T.A.T. in Appeal preferred by the Revenue has dismissed the Appeal by recording a finding that since the assessment year 1985-86 to 1991-92 and thereafter for all the assessment years the Revenue had allowed exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act and the Revenue cannot be permitted to take a different stand relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Radhaswami Satrang vs. C.I.T. (1992) 1 SCC 659 and Radhaswami Satrang vs. C.I.T. (1992) 1 SCC 659 and193 ITR 321 (S.C.). In our opinion the order of the 193 ITR 321 (S.C.). Tribunal cannot be faulted. Consequently Appeal dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan