The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.offshore Power Operations Cv
High Court
21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.offshore Power Operations Cv
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.offshore Power Operations Cv, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1182 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1182 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1182 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.846 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.846 OF 2008
The Director of Income Tax ..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Offshore Power Operations CV ..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA
DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 1103 days’ delay caused in filing the
Appeal against the order dated 16/09/2004, passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Perused the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion. It
appears that the last date for filing of Appeal was
08/03/2005. On perusal of the Affidavit-in-support of
the Notice of Motion it appears that it does not even
mention that on which the Chief Commissioner of Income
Tax had granted approval for filing an Appeal. However,
the Appeal came to be filed on 17/03/2008 i.e. after a
lapse of almost three years.
2. The reasons given for delay that the concerned Officer had to share a Stenographer of another Officer and that of delay in getting the draft memo of Appeal
prepared and non-availability of Court fee stamps etc.
does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause
is made out for condoning the delay. We are not
satisfied with the reasons given for condonation of
delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income
Tax Appeal (L) No.846 of 2008 also stands dismissed.
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.