The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.satellite Television Asian Region Ltd
High Court
09 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.satellite Television Asian Region Ltd
Date of order
09 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S.satellite Television Asian Region Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In view of dismissal of Notices of Motion both the appeals stand dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2180 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1383 OF 2007
The Director of Income Tax
..Appellant
Vs.M/s.Satellite Television Asian Region Ltd. ..Respondent
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2181 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1386 OF 2007
The Director of Income Tax
Vs.M/s.Societe Generale
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.J.S.Saluja for appellant.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE :- 9TH JULY, 2009
1.Admittedly, both the appeals are barred by limitation. No sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay in filing the appeals. Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2.In this view of the matter, both the Notices of Motion stand dismissed.
3.In view of dismissal of Notices of Motion both the appeals stand dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.