Case Law › High Court › The Director Of Income Tax,Delhi v. Ls C...

The Director Of Income Tax,Delhi v. Ls Cable Limited

High Court 12 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

12 Jan 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax,Delhi v. Ls Cable Limited, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 13. + W.P.(C) 12188/2015 THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rahul Chaudhary, Advocate. versus LS CABLE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr Amit Shrivastava, Advocate. CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % O R D E R12.01.2016 1. The challenge in this writ petition by the Revenue is to an order dated 26[th]July, 2011 passed by the Authority for Advance Ruling (Income Tax) (AAR) in AAR No.858-861 of 2009. The point sought to be urged is covered against the Revenue by two decisions of this Court concerning the same Assessee - the first dated 24[th] December, 2010 in ITA No.703/2009 (Director of Income Tax v. LG Cables Ltd.) and the other dated 30[th] September, 2011 in ITA No.707/2011 (Director of Income Tax v. L. S. Cables Ltd.). 2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J JANUARY 12, 2016 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J W.P.(C) 12188/2015 Page 1 of 1

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.