Case Law › High Court › The Director Of Income-Tax(Exemption v....

The Director Of Income-Tax(Exemption v. Breach Candy Swiming Bath Trust

High Court 26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

26 Mar 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Director Of Income-Tax(Exemption v. Breach Candy Swiming Bath Trust, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1526 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.497 OF 2004 The Director of Income-tax(Exemption)..Appellant Versus Breach Candy Swiming Bath Trust ..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani & Mr.B.D.Damodar i/by Kanga & Co. for respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26th March, 2008. PC 1. There is a delay of 102 days. Considering the cause shown and as the appeal is heard on merits, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.497 OF 2004 . Similar issue has come up for consideration in Income TAx Appeal (L) No.496/2004. For the reasons given therein, we find that the question of law as raised, would not arise and consequently appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.