The Director Of Income Tax(Exemptions) Mumbai v. J.k.sports Foundations Ltd
High Court
17 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax(Exemptions) Mumbai v. J.k.sports Foundations Ltd
Date of order
17 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax(Exemptions) Mumbai v. J.k.sports Foundations Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Under these circumstances, we are constrainedto dismiss the above appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.357 of 2005
The Director of Income Tax(Exemptions) Mumbai... Appellant
Vs.
J.K.Sports Foundations Ltd .. Respondent
None for AppellantMr.V.B.Patel for Respondent
CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATED : 17th June, 2008
P.C.
1.Heard learned learned counsel for therespondent.
2. Unfortunately, in the above matter on 3rdJune, 2008 we had very categorically recordedMr.P.S.Sahadevan’s statement that he will filevakalatnama on behaof of the appellant within aperiod of two weeks from that date. Hence, theappeal was adjourned to 17thJUne, 2008.Mr.Sahadevan had assured that he will filehisvakalatnama since Mr.Pankaj Kapoor who wasearlier Advocate for the Central Government ceasedtobe an Advocate for the appellant. Today, noneappears for the appellant. No vakalatnama isfiledon behalf of the appellant.
3. We have been noticing in a large number of
matters, the Revenue has not filed appropriatevakalatnamas, and even after grant of two weeks,the same has not been complied with.
4. Under these circumstances, we are constrainedto dismiss the above appeal. In view of thenon-compliance of the aforesaid order, we feel itwould be appropriate if the concerned Director ofof Income Tax (Exemptions) Mumbai shall deposit inthis court within a period of 2 weeks a sum ofRs.10,000/- from his personal funds, by way ofcosts.
List the matter after 3 weeks to ensurecompliance.
{A.V.Nirgude, J}(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J}
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.