In The Director Of Income Tax(International Taxation v. Chadbourne & Park, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008 P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.The learned Counsel for the Appellant states that heis appearing on behalf of the Appellant in the abovematter and fairly states that he does not have papersand also he does not know whether the Notice of Motionis served on th...
Decision: 2.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.172 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.75 OF 2006
The Director of Income Tax(International Taxation)
..Appellant
Vs.
Chadbourne & Park ..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.The learned Counsel for the Appellant states that heis appearing on behalf of the Appellant in the abovematter and fairly states that he does not have papersand also he does not know whether the Notice of Motionis served on the other side or not. The above Noticeof Motion was registered as far back as on 23rdJanuary,2006. In view of the lack of instructions and
total lack of assistance to this Court, the Notice of
Motion stands dismissed.
2.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue