The Director Of Income Tax,(It)-1,Mumbai v. M/S. Twentieth Century Fox Internationalcorporation
High Court
31 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax,(It)-1,Mumbai v. M/S. Twentieth Century Fox Internationalcorporation
Date of order
31 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax,(It)-1,Mumbai v. M/S. Twentieth Century Fox Internationalcorporation, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3 In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1538 OF 2011
The Director of Income Tax,(IT)-1,Mumbai,
..Appellant
versus M/s. Twentieth Century Fox InternationalCorporation..Respondent
--------
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.............
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
P.C.:
In this appeal by the revenue, the
following question of law has been framed for our consideration:
“Whether, on the fact and circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was right in holding that in view of the provisions of Section 195 obliging the deduction of tax at source of the entire income of a non resident, the assessee is not liable to pay advance tax and therefore, no interest under Section 234B or 234C is leviable?”
2
Since the Tribunal has allowed the
respondent-assessee's appeal by following the
decision of this court in the matter of Director of Income Tax v. NGC Network Asia, LLC reported in 313 ITR page 187, we find no fault with the order of the Tribunal.
3
In the circumstances, the appeal is
dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.