The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Cantonment, Aurangabad v. Bhimrao
High Court
12 Feb 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Cantonment, Aurangabad v. Bhimrao
Date of order
12 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Cantonment, Aurangabad v. Bhimrao, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 ca 85.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 85 OF 2016
INREJECTED CASE NO. 528 OF 2014
INWRIT PETITION ST. NO. 27684 OF 2013
The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Cantonment, Aurangabad
.. Applicant
Versus
Bhimrao S/o Baswant Patil
.. Respondent
Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA ANDA. M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2016.
PER COURT :
.Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
2.For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" on condition that, the objections are removed within a period of three (3) weeks from today. The civil application is disposed of.
[ A. M. BADAR, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Feb. 16
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue