In The Haryana State-Co-Operative v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: (ORAL) 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the presentwrit petition has become infructuous and be disposed of as such.Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the same.2.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of asinfructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.8926 of 2002 (O&M)Date of Decision:06.08.2014
The Haryana State-Co-operative ...Petitionersupply & Marketing Federation Ltd.
Versus
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh ...Respondentsand another
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Present: Mr. Rajesh Garg, Senior Advocate with|Ms. Namrita Shergill, Advocatefor the petitioner.Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate forMr. Tejinder K. Joshi, Advocatefor the respondents.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the presentwrit petition has become infructuous and be disposed of as such.Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the same.2.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of asinfructuous.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE(FATEH DEEP SINGH)06.08.2014JUDGEaarti
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue