The Haryana Warehousing Corporation, Panchkula v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula And Another
High Court
09 May 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Haryana Warehousing Corporation, Panchkula v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula And Another
Date of order
09 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Haryana Warehousing Corporation, Panchkula v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula And Another, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 3725 of 2016
Date of Decision: 9.5.2016
The Haryana Warehousing Corporation, Panchkula
Versus
....Petitioner.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula and another
...Respondents.
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG.
PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Garg, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sundeep Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
1.In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of theConstitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ inthe nature of certiorari for quashing the notices dated 28.10.2015(Annexure P-3) and dated 21.9.2015 (Annexure P-8) issued by theAssessing Officer under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and tore-assess its income for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12.
2.After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for thepetitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the presentpetition with liberty to take recourse to the appellate remedy.3.Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to thepetitioner to take recourse to the remedy as may be available to it inaccordance with law.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
JUDGE
May 9, 2016gbs
(RAJ RAHUL GARG)
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue