The Hon’ble Sri Justi Ce v. Ramasubramani An And
High Court
24 Jan 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
The Hon’ble Sri Justi Ce v. Ramasubramani An And
Date of order
24 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Hon’ble Sri Justi Ce v. Ramasubramani An And, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.C.No.31 of 2002
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)
The monetary value of the reference is within the ceiling limit prescribed by the Circular issued by the CBDT. Therefore, the reference is closed. However, in view of the fact that this is an old matter, we grant liberty to the department to seek restoration, in the event the case is found to fall within any one of the exceptions.
2. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________ JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN
24[th] January, 2017Js.
__________________
JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI
Js.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI
R.C.No.31 of 2002
Date: 24-01-2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue