In The Hon’ble Sri Justi Ce v. Ramasubramani An And, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal is dismissed leaving the questions of law open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI
I .T.T.A.No.66 of 2001
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)
Heard Ms. M. Kiranmayee, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant.
2. It is seen that the amount of tax involved is less than the monetary ceiling limit prescribed in Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed leaving the questions of law open.
5. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________
JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN
19[th] January, 2017Js.
__________________ JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI
Js.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI
I .T.T.A.No.66 of 2001
Date: 19-01-2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue