The Hon’ble Sri Justi Ce v. Ramasubramani An And
High Court
22 Feb 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
The Hon’ble Sri Justi Ce v. Ramasubramani An And
Date of order
22 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Hon’ble Sri Justi Ce v. Ramasubramani An And, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI
I .T.T.A.No.37 of 2017
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The order impugned in this appeal is consequential to the order passed arising out of the revision. That appeal has already been dismissed by this Court by an order passed today in I.T.T.A.No.103 of 2017. Therefore, the present appeal, as a consequence, should also be dismissed. Hence it is dismissed.
2. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
22[nd] February, 2017Js.
__________________________ JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN __________________ JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI
Js.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI
I .T.T.A.No.37 of 2017
Date: 22-02-2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue