The Hon’ble Srijustice A v. Ravindra Babuitta.no: 193 Of 2007
High Court
05 Dec 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
The Hon’ble Srijustice A v. Ravindra Babuitta.no: 193 Of 2007
Date of order
05 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Hon’ble Srijustice A v. Ravindra Babuitta.no: 193 Of 2007, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3.The Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATITHURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREEPRESENTTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRIJUSTICE A. V. RAVINDRA BABUITTA.NO: 193 OF 2007
Appeal under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act. 1961 against theorderoftheincomeTaxAppellateTribunalVisakhapatnamBench,Visakhapatnam dated 29-09-2006 passed in I.T.(SS) A.No.101A//2002 for theblock period01/04/1989 to 10/12/1999 preferred against the order of theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-1), Hyderabaddated22/03/2002passed in Appeal No.45/Tr./CC.VSP/CIT(A)-1/01-02 for the block period 01-04-1989to10-12-1999preferredagainsttheorderoftheDeputyCommissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1Visakhapatnam passedinPAN/GIR No. A-602, dated 28-12-2001 for the block period 01-04-1989 to 10-12-1999.
Between:
M/s. All Saints Christian Educational'Society, Ramnagar, Visakhapatnam.
...Appellant
AND
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. Circle-1, Visakhapatnam.Vijayawada.
...Respondent
Counsel for the AppellantrSRI. S. RAVI(NP)Counsel for the Respondent: STANDING COUNSEL FOR INCOMETAX
The Court made the following:
THE HON^BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 193 OF 2007
JUDGMENT;- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
No representation for the appellant.
2.The matter is in the weekly cause list.
3.The Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed for
want of prosecution.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,
shall also stand closed.
SD/- P. VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRAR/l/V—SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1. The Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam.[Bench]Visakhapatnam.Visakhapatnam.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals-1), Hyderabad.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Cetral Circle-1,
Visakhapatnam.
4. One CC to SRI. S RAVI, Advocate,
5. Three C.D.Copies
nm
HIGH COURT
DATED:07/12/2023
ORDER
ITTA.No.193 of 2007
S31 JUL 20?'|F^. current Section^i^gSPATCH^2>
THE INCOME TAXTRIBUNAL APPEAL IS DISMISSEDFOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
>■v
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.