The Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Transfer Pricing Officer 2(1), Tower
High Court
01 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Transfer Pricing Officer 2(1), Tower
Date of order
01 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Honourable Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Transfer Pricing Officer 2(1), Tower, the High Court (2021) decided the matter under Section 143, Section 92CA of the Income-tax Act.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
DATED: 01.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P. No.16511 of 2020 &WMP. Nos.20484 & 20486 of 2020
M/s.Haworth India Private Limited,9[th] Floor, Imperial Building, 610A, 612, Anna Salai, Teynampet,Chenni 600 018.Represented by its Director,Mr.Vasudeva Rao Anand…Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Transfer Pricing Officer 2(1), Tower -1, BSNL Building, 16, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 2(2), 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai - 600 034. …Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitu-tion of India praying to Writ of Certiorari to call for therecords of the 1[st] respondent and quash the impugned order passedunder Section 92CA of the Act dated 01.11.2019 in PAN:AAACH8417KfortheAssessmentyear2016-17inorderNo.ITBA/TPO/F/92CA3/2019-20/1019692128 (1) and the FinalAssessment Order passed by the 2[nd] Respondent vide OrderNo.ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2019-20/1025145839(1) dated 13.02.2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.SP. ChidambaramFor Respondents : Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, Senior Standing Counsel*********
The petitioner has challenged an order of assessment dated13.02.2020 passed under Section 143 (3) r/w 144C(3) of the
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'Act'). The impugned order ispassed on the basis of the request of the petitioner to pass afinal assessment order and recording the position that theassessee wishes to prefer an appeal against the same before theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
2. In such circumstances, it would not be appropriate tointerfere with the impugned order challenged in this writpetition, as the petitioner has availed of alternate statutoryremedy against the same.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed, permittingthe petitioner to raise additional grounds chatting thevalidity of the impugned order before the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals), to be adjudicated in accordance with law.Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
//True Copy//
vs/rkpTo
Sub Assistant Registrar
1.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Transfer Pricing Officer 2(1), Tower -1, BSNL Building, 16, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 2(2), 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai - 600 034.
+1cc to M/s.Hema Muralikrishnan, Advocate SR.12634
W.P. No.16511 of 2020 &WMP. Nos.20484 & 20486 of 2020
PMK(CO)CB(18/03/2021)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.