The Honourable Dr.justiceanita Sumanth v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,International Taxation 1(2),Room
High Court
06 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Honourable Dr.justiceanita Sumanth v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,International Taxation 1(2),Room
Date of order
06 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Honourable Dr.justiceanita Sumanth v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax,International Taxation 1(2),Room, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
W.P.No.8479 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.06.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTH
W.P.No.8479 of 2023
M/s Kern Enterprise LtdEarlier known as M/s.Kern Logistics LtdFindex NZ Ltd, TE AHI Building, Level 113, Camp Street, Queenstown,New Zeland.Rep. By its Director,Mr.Kannan Narayananhaving residence at:No.97, Kalpaviruksha, 11[th] Cross,Malleswaram, Bengaluru 560 003... Petitioner
vs
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,International Taxation 1(2),Room No.408, BSNL Building 4[th] Floor,Income Tax Office – BSNL Tower,No.16, Greams Road,Chennai 06... Respondent
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider and dispose the rectification cum refund application under Section 155 (14A) read with Section 128 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.03.2022 filed by the petitioner and grant the refused of taxes for the Assessment Years 2017-18 to 2020 – 21.
For Petitioner:Ms.Vandana VyasFor Respondent:Mr.Prabu Mukund Arunkumar
ORDER
1.Read this order in continuation of and in conjunction with order dated 23.03.2023, that reads as follows:-
“Mr.Prabhu Mukund Arun Kumar, learned Junior Standing Counsel states that the application of the petitioner under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, addressed to the Centralised Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System (CPGRAMS), was forwarded for the comments of the Assessing Officer and the Assessing Officer has, in his comments, addressed directly to CPGRAMS through Commissioner, stated that the application is not feasible of acceptance as it is beyond the scope of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. This has also been communicated by CPGRAMS to the petitioner.
2. However, neither the Assessing Officer
nor CPGRAMS have heard the petitioner. It stands to reason that at least the Assessing Officer ought to have heard the petitioner prior to forwarding of the report to CPGRAMS, as otherwise the petitioner would not have been heard by any authority in the sequence of these transactions.
3. Hence, let notice be issued to the petitioner by the Assessing Authority, petitioner heard and orders passed on or before 05.06.2023.
4. List on 06.06.2023 under the caption 'for production of orders'.”
2.Today, both learned counsel concur on the position that
pursuant to order dated 23.03.2023, an order of assessment has been passed on 12.05.2023. With this, as nothing further survives in this writ petition, the same stands closed. No costs.
06.06.2023
Index:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yesssm
To:
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,International Taxation 1(2),Room No.408, BSNL Building 4[th] Floor,Income Tax Office – BSNL Tower,No.16, Greams Road,Chennai 06.
W.P.No.8479 of 2023
DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.
ssm
W.P.No.8479 of 2023
06.06.2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.