Case LawHigh Court › The Income Tax Commissioner-22, Mumbai v...

The Income Tax Commissioner-22, Mumbai v. Shri Sunil Baviskar

High Court 02 Aug 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Income Tax Commissioner-22, Mumbai v. Shri Sunil Baviskar
Date of order
02 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Income Tax Commissioner-22, Mumbai v. Shri Sunil Baviskar, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3621 OF 2010 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 5004 OF 2010 The Income Tax Commissioner-22, Mumbai...Appellant.Vs. Shri Sunil Baviskar..Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr. Jitendra Singh for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 2ND AUGUST, 2011. P.C. 1.By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a) and (b). ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) ( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan