The Income Tax Commissioner-7 v. M/S Siemens Ltd
High Court
11 Aug 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Income Tax Commissioner-7 v. M/S Siemens Ltd
Date of order
11 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Income Tax Commissioner-7 v. M/S Siemens Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2788 OF 2010
INCOME TAX APPEAL 419 NO. OF 2010
The Income Tax Commissioner-7
...Appellant.
Vs.
M/s Siemens Ltd...Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.Mr. Nitesh Joshi with Arun Siwach i/by Amar Chand & Mangaldas & S.A. Shroff & Co. for the Respondent.
P.C.
DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2011.
1.This Notice of Motion is taken out for seeking condonation of delay of 328 days in filing the appeal. Although the reasons given for condonation of delay in the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion are not satisfactory, looking to the stakes involved in the appeal, interest of justice would be met, if delay is condoned by imposing costs of Rs. 5000/-. Accordingly subject to payment of costs of Rs.5000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent within a period of 2 weeks from today, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.Notice of Motion is disposed of.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue