The Income Tax Department v. Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha
High Court
29 Apr 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Income Tax Department v. Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha
Date of order
29 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Income Tax Department v. Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1839 of 2020In F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 16389 of 2020
==========================================================
THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT VersusGUJARAT MAZDOOR SABHA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA for MS MAITHILI MEHTA for the Applicant(s) No. 1MR AMRESH N PATEL(2277) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2MR YOGI K GADHIA(5913) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK Date : 29/04/2022 ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA)
1.Heard Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, learned advocate for Ms.Maithili Mehta, learned advocate for the applicant, Mr.Amresh Patel, learned advocate for opponents no.1 and 2and Mr. Yogi Gadhia, learned advocate for opponent no.3.Ms. Mehta, learned advocate for the applicant shall fileVakalatnama on behalf of the applicant latest by6.5.2022.
2.In facts and circumstances of the case andconsidering the averments made in the application, delayof 211 days occurred in filing the appeal deserves to becondoned and is hereby condoned. Mr. Patel as well as Mr.Gadhia, learned advocates for the opponents have noobjection if the delay is condoned.
3.Accordingly, the application is allowed.
(R.M.CHHAYA,J)
(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.