Case LawHigh Court › The Income Tax Officer-12(2)(1 v. M/S. S...

The Income Tax Officer-12(2)(1 v. M/S. Sanjeev Woolen Mills

High Court 14 Aug 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Income Tax Officer-12(2)(1 v. M/S. Sanjeev Woolen Mills
Date of order
14 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
1998-1999
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Income Tax Officer-12(2)(1 v. M/S. Sanjeev Woolen Mills, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 5531 OF 2010 The Income Tax Officer-12(2)(1) versus M/s. Sanjeev Woolen Mills ..Appellant ..Respondent -------- Ms. S.V.Bharucha for the Appellant. Mr. S.P.Goyal, Partner-representative of Respondent -Company present. ............. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR &M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATED : 14[th] August, 2012 P.C. : 1This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been filed by the Revenue against the order dated 03.11.2009 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of assessment year 1998-1999 in Income Tax Appeal No. 5080/Mum/2007. 2 The grievance of the Appellant in the present appeal is dropping of penalty proceeding under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal dropped the penalty proceedings in view of its order dated 08.10.2009 in Income Tax Appeal No. 3323/Mum/2004 in quantum proceedings. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had by its order dated 08.10.2009 allowed the respondent-assessee's appeal in quantum appeal. We are informed that the Revenue has not preferred any appeal against the order dated 08.10.2009 of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of the quantum proceedings before this court. 3In the circumstances, no fault can be found with the order of the Tribunal dated 03.11.2009. Therefore, no question of law arises. 4The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan