In The Income Tax Officer v. C/Taxap/70/2008 Order, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/70/2008 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 70 of 2008With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 101 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1029 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1167 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1169 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1195 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1196 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1197 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1374 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1436 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1491 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1534 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1558 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1598 of 2008With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1599 of 2008With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 16 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1819 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1866 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1927 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2028 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2029 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2030 of 2010
C/TAXAP/70/2008 ORDER
With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 218 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 2348 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 242 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 431 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 444 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 541 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 613 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 614 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 732 of 2010With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 845 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 863 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 871 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 873 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 944 of 2009With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 988 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 989 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 990 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 991 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 992 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 993 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 994 of 2011
==========================================================
THE INCOME TAX OFFICERVersus
C/TAXAP/70/2008 ORDER
KANSAI TEXO TUBE PRIVATE LIMITED
==========================================================
Appearance:MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MR RK PATEL(1082) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 17/09/2018
COMMON ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Learned advocate Mrs.Kalpana K. Raval, under instructions from the department, sought permission to withdraw these appeals since the tax effect involved in these appeals is below the minimum threshold limit provided by CBDT in its circular dated 11.07.2018 enabling the department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court.
Permission is granted. Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
ANKIT SHAH
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.