Case LawHigh Court › The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 & Another...

The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 & Another v. Opposite Parties

High Court 04 May 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 & Another v. Opposite Parties
Date of order
04 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 & Another v. Opposite Parties, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: With the above observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P (C) No.11355 of 2023 M/s. Mayurbhanj Sabai Grass ….. PetitionerMr.Upasana Bal, Advocate The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 & Another Vs. ….. Opposite Parties Mr.Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, Sr. Standing Counsel (Income Tax) Order No.01. CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN ORDER 04.05.2023 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2.Against the notice of show, the Petitioner has approached this Court in the present writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contends that the matter is covered by order of this Court dated 20.2.2023 passed in W.P.(C) No. 3898 of 2023 and submits that this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the said order. ASWINI KUMAR SETHYDigitally signed by ASWINI KUMAR SETHY Date: 2023.05.05 11:12:28 +05'30' 4. Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department vehemently contended that this writ petition cannot be decided on the basis of the order which has beenrelied upon by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. That apart the said order is under challenge in SLP before the Apex Court which is pending consideration. He further contended that the Petitioner has already filed an appeal against the assessment order which is passed pursuant to impugned notice which is pending adjudication. Against notice of show cause, the Petitioner could not have Aks approached this Court in the present writ petition. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the record, since the Petitioner has already responded to the assessment order passed pursuant to show cause notice by filing an appeal which is pending, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition at this stage. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to pursue the appeal before the appropriate authority which shall be considered in accordance with law. 6. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan