Case LawHigh Court › The Income Tax Officer Ward-25(2)(3) & O...

The Income Tax Officer Ward-25(2)(3) & Ors v. Wp-2963-19.Doc

High Court 06 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Income Tax Officer Ward-25(2)(3) & Ors v. Wp-2963-19.Doc
Date of order
06 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Income Tax Officer Ward-25(2)(3) & Ors v. Wp-2963-19.Doc, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: 2In the circumstances, we set aside the order dated 24[th] September2019 and direct the Assessing Officer to consider petitioner’s objectionscontained in the letter dated 16[th] September 2019 and pass a fresh order onmerits.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2021.12.0717:38:10+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.2963 OF 2019 Dhaval Vijay Karia V/s. ….Petitioner The Income Tax Officer Ward-25(2)(3) & Ors. …Respondents ---- Mr. Vipul Joshi a/w Ms Dinkle Hariya i/b Ms Namrata Kasale for PetitionerMr. Sham V. Walve for Respondents – Revenue ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ DATED : 6th DECEMBER 2021 P.C. : 1Heard the counsel for petitioner and we are satisfied that the orderdated 24[th] September 2019 disposing the objections raised by petitioner tothe notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961, is devoidof material details. The objections raised by petitioner have not been dealtwith at all. 2In the circumstances, we set aside the order dated 24[th] September2019 and direct the Assessing Officer to consider petitioner’s objectionscontained in the letter dated 16[th] September 2019 and pass a fresh order onmerits. The Assessing Officer shall gave petitioner a personal hearing withadvance notice of atleast two weeks and dispose the objections within twoweeks thereafter. The Assessing Officer is directed to consider all pointsraised by petitioner and pass a reasoned order dealing with all theMeera Jadhav objections raised by petitioner in accordance with law. 3Petition disposed. (AMIT B. BORKAR, J) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan