Case Law › High Court › The Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1), Mumbai...

The Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1), Mumbai v. Abhay Ahuja, Jj

High Court 12 Aug 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

12 Aug 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1), Mumbai v. Abhay Ahuja, Jj, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINTERIM APPLICATION NO.618 OF 2021IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.370 OF 2020 Regency Soraj Infrastructure ….Appellant/Applicant V/s. The Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1), Mumbai …Respondent ---- None for appellant/applicant. Mr. Sham V. Walve for respondent. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATED : 12[th] AUGUST 2021 P.C. : 1None for applicant/appellant. 2Appeal dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for in the interim application. 3Interim application disposed. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.