The Income Tax Officerinternational Taxation I (1), Chennai v. Appellant(S
High Court
25 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Income Tax Officerinternational Taxation I (1), Chennai v. Appellant(S
Date of order
25 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Income Tax Officerinternational Taxation I (1), Chennai v. Appellant(S, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid, this Tax Case (Appeal) relating to assessment year 2006-07 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25-04-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
TCA No. 646 of 2016
1. Shri AboobuckerNo.47, Model School Road, Chennai-06. Pan: Afopa 2872f.
1. The Income Tax OfficerInternational Taxation I (1), Chennai.
Vs
Appellant(s)
Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to set aside order dated 31.12.2015 made in I.T.A.No.1793/Mds/2013 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai.
For Appellant(s):Mr.A.S.Sriraman
For Respondent(s):No Appearance
Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.AND
C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.)
Mr.A.S.Sriraman, learned counsel for the appellant requests for
withdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the assessee has availed the on-
going Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
2. Recording the aforesaid, this Tax Case (Appeal) relating to assessment
year 2006-07 is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(ANITA SUMANTH J.)(C.KUMARAPPAN J.)sl25-04-2025Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/NoTo
1.The Income Tax OfficerInternational Taxation I (1), Chennai.
T.C.(A)No.646 of 2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue