The Indian Institute Of Architects v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) & Ors
High Court
13 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Indian Institute Of Architects v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) & Ors
Date of order
13 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Indian Institute Of Architects v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) & Ors, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
420-wp-932-2020.doc
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 932 OF 2020
The Indian Institute of Architects
…Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) & Ors.
…Respondents
----------
Mr. Mandar M. Vaidya for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sham V. Walve with Mr. Pritish Chatterjee for the Respondents.
----------
Digitally signedby JITENDRAJITENDRASHANKARSHANKARNIJASURENIJASUREDate:2021.09.1516:06:11 +0530
CORAM :K.R. SHRIRAM &R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 13 SEPTEMBER, 2021.
ORDER :
1.
After petition was heard for sometime, the counsel for
petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition but requested thatthe CIT Appeals be directed to dispose of the appeal filed by thepetitioner within shortest possible time.
2.Mr. Vaidya states that petitioner is an Association ofArchitects and registered trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act,
2.
420-wp-932-2020.doc
1950 and also with CIT (Exemptions) under Section 12AA of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 and therefore, it would be helpful if the appealis disposed of expeditiously.
3.Mr. Vaidya submits that the income of the petitioner isexempted under section 11 of the Act as the income is derived fromproperty held under trust for charitable purposes.
4.Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The Commissioner ofCIT Appeals is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitionerwithin three months from today after giving personal hearing topetitioner in accordance with rules prescribed thereof. We will hastento add, we have not made any observations on the merits of the case.
[R.I. CHAGLA J.]
[K.R. SHRIRAM, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.