Case LawHigh Court › The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ra...

The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Jodhpur v. Marudhar Hotels P. Ltd. Umaid Bhawan Palace, Jodhpur (Raj

High Court 02 Aug 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Jodhpur v. Marudhar Hotels P. Ltd. Umaid Bhawan Palace, Jodhpur (Raj
Date of order
02 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Jodhpur v. Marudhar Hotels P. Ltd. Umaid Bhawan Palace, Jodhpur (Raj, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12640/2015 The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Jodhpur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Marudhar Hotels P. Ltd. Umaid Bhawan Palace, Jodhpur (Raj). 2. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. H.G.ChandaFor Respondent(s): Mr. Ramit Mehta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA 02/08/2019 Order The instant writ petition is filed by Income Tax Departmentto challenge interim order, passed by Income Tax AppellateTribunal (ITAT). It is stated at Bar by learned counsel for the Departmentthat now ITAT has finally decided the appeal. In view of the subsequent developments and final decision ofthe appeal itself, the instant writ petition has renderedinfructuous. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. 29-RP/- (SANGEET LODHA),J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan