Case LawHigh Court › The Learned Tribunal Applied The Ratio O...

The Learned Tribunal Applied The Ratio Of The v. State Oforissa (1972) 83 Itr 26 Sc And Set Aside The Order

High Court 26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Learned Tribunal Applied The Ratio Of The v. State Oforissa (1972) 83 Itr 26 Sc And Set Aside The Order
Date of order
26 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Learned Tribunal Applied The Ratio Of The v. State Oforissa (1972) 83 Itr 26 Sc And Set Aside The Order, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2954 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1745 OF 2007 The CIT-9 .. Appellant V/s. M/s.Duesberg Bossons Fils Pvt.Ltd.,.Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26.02.2008. PC 1. There is a delay of 77 days in preferring the appeal. In the instant case a penalty was levied for accepting monies in violation of section 269 SS. The learned Tribunal applied the ratio of the judgment of Hindustan Steels Ltd. Vs. State ofOrissa (1972) 83 ITR 26 SC and set aside the order of penalty. 2. In our opinion, considering the facts, it cannot be said that the view taken by the Tribunal was perverse. 3. Considering the above, question as framed would not arise. Appeal alongwith Motion dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan