In The National Rayon Corp Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.2 OF 1996
The National Rayon Corp Ltd.
: Appellant
v/s
The Commissioner of Income Tax : Respondent
Mr. S.J. Mehta for AppellantMs. Devaku Iyer i/b Vimal Gupta for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date : 24.9.2008
P.C.
.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the learned counsel for the respondent.
.counsel.
The following question is argued by the
law has already been answered in favour of theassessee and against the revenue by judgment of theHon’ble Supreme Court in case of Surana Steels Pvtltd. Deputy Commiossioner of Income Tax 237 ITR 777.
In view thereof the reference is answered in favour of
the assessee and against the revenue.
.The learned counsel Mr. Mehta states thatapplicant is not keen to proceed with the notice motion taken out in the above reference. In viewthereof notice of motion stands dismissed.
of
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.