Case LawHigh Court › The National Rayon Corp Ltd v. The Commi...

The National Rayon Corp Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 24 Sep 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The National Rayon Corp Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The National Rayon Corp Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.2 OF 1996 The National Rayon Corp Ltd. : Appellant v/s The Commissioner of Income Tax : Respondent Mr. S.J. Mehta for AppellantMs. Devaku Iyer i/b Vimal Gupta for respondent Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date : 24.9.2008 P.C. .Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. .counsel. The following question is argued by the law has already been answered in favour of theassessee and against the revenue by judgment of theHon’ble Supreme Court in case of Surana Steels Pvtltd. Deputy Commiossioner of Income Tax 237 ITR 777. In view thereof the reference is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. .The learned counsel Mr. Mehta states thatapplicant is not keen to proceed with the notice motion taken out in the above reference. In viewthereof notice of motion stands dismissed. of (S.J. Kathawalla,J.) (Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan