The New Truck Operators Union, Ludhiana v. Pr. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
High Court
31 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The New Truck Operators Union, Ludhiana v. Pr. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
Date of order
31 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The New Truck Operators Union, Ludhiana v. Pr. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: CWP-12092-2018 (O&M) 3, The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
218IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH)
CW P-12092-2018 (O&MDate of decision: 31.10.2018
The New Truck Operators Union, Ludhiana
— Petitioner|
Versus
Pr. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax & anr.
.... Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS, JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present:Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Sr. Standing Counsel for the respondents.
6666
Ajay Kumar Mtttal, J.(Oral)
CM;16608F2018
Allowed as prayed for.
CM;16609F2018
Application is allowed. Reply along with annexures R-1 andR-2 filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Office to tag theSame at appropriate place.
Main case
This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of theConstitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing therespondent to constitute Local Committee to deal with petitioner'sgrievances from High Pitched Scrutiny Assessment regarding assessment inthe case of petitioner for Assessment year 2013-14 and 2014-15.
?DIn view of the stand taken by the respondent, learned counselfor the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has been renderedinfructuous as the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.
CWP-12092-2018 (O&M)
3,
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
31.10.2018sonia
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking?Whether reportable?
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.