The Only Question Framed Is Covered By The v. Lazor Syntex
High Court
26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Only Question Framed Is Covered By The v. Lazor Syntex
Date of order
26 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Only Question Framed Is Covered By The v. Lazor Syntex, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.49 OF 2004
The CIT ..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Ornamental Trading Enterprises
Pvt. Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the
appellant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26.02.2008.
PC
1. The only question framed is covered by the
judgment of this Court in CIT Vs. Lazor Syntex
Limited in Income Tax Application No.11 of 1999
decided on 11.6.2007.
2. In the light of that, the question as framed
would not arise and consequently, appeal dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue