Case LawHigh Court › The Pattambi Service Co-Operative Bank L...

The Pattambi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.no. P v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna

High Court 15 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
The Pattambi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.no. P v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
Date of order
15 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Pattambi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.no. P v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM WEDNESDAY, THE 15 DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1944WP(C) NO. 8656 OF 2023 PETITIONER: THE PATTAMBI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. P 585, RAZMALL COMPLEX, PALLIPURAM ROAD, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD , REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,PARAMESWARAN M, PIN - 679303BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNA RESPONDENTS: 1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICERNATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, PIN - 1100012NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTREDELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)., PIN - 1100013THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1 & TPS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, ENGLISH CHURCH ROAD,PALAKKAD, PIN - 678014 OTHER PRESENT: SC-SRI.JOSE JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.03.2023, THE COURT ON THESAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VIJU ABRAHAM, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C). No.8656 of 2023 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15[th] day of March, 2023 JUDGMENT Challenging Ext.P1 assessment order for the year 2021-22, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal and Exts.P3 staypetition, before the 2[nd]respondent. The petitioner seeksexpeditious disposal of Exts.P2 and P3. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. 3. After hearing both sides, I dispose of the writ petition withthe following directions: (i)The 2[nd] respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition within an outerlimit of two months from today. (ii)Till orders are passed as directed above, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order, shall be kept in abeyance. Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/ APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8656/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2020-21 DTD. 20-09-2022Exhibit P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 20-10-2022Exhibit P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.20-10-2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan