The Petitioner Relies On The Judgment Of Thehon’ble Supreme Court In Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Commissioner Of Incometax; 2021 (1) Klt 485 And Submits That The
High Court
23 Jan 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
The Petitioner Relies On The Judgment Of Thehon’ble Supreme Court In Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Commissioner Of Incometax; 2021 (1) Klt 485 And Submits That The
Date of order
23 Jan 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Petitioner Relies On The Judgment Of Thehon’ble Supreme Court In Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Commissioner Of Incometax; 2021 (1) Klt 485 And Submits That The, the High Court (2023) decided the matter under Section 80P of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: Thewrit petition is hence disposed of with a direction tothe 3[rd] respondent to consider and pass orders onExt.P2 appeal as expeditiously as possible.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
MONDAY, THE 23 DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 3RD MAGHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 2039 OF 2023
23.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
T.R.RAVI, J.
--------------------------------------------
W.P.(C.) No.2039 of 2023--------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23[rd]day of January, 2023JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Societyregistered under the Kerala Co-operative SocietiesAct, 1969. Ext.P1 order of assessment was issuedagainst the petitioner. In the assessment order,petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P ofthe Income Tax Act was rejected on the ground thatthere was no evidence to show that the petitionersatisfied the ingredients of the Primary AgriculturalCredit Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.The petitioner has preferredExt.P2 appeal.
2. The petitioner relies on the judgment of theHon’ble Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of IncomeTax; 2021 (1) KLT 485 and submits that the
assessment order has been issued withoutconsidering the effect of the judgment.
Since the petitioner has already preferred anappeal, interest of justice will be met if a direction isissued to the Appellate Authority to consider and passorders on Ext.P2 appeal in a time bound manner. Thewrit petition is hence disposed of with a direction tothe 3[rd] respondent to consider and pass orders onExt.P2 appeal as expeditiously as possible. Nocoercive steps shall be initiated against the petitionerpursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order till the disposalof the appeal.
SKP/23-01
Sd/-
T.R.RAVIJUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2039/2023
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2022-23/1048180718(1) DATED 22-12-2022 ISSUED FOR THE YEAR 2021-22 BY THE 2NDRESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 27-12-2022 FILED FOR THE YEAR 2021-22 BEFORE THE3RDRESPONDENT BYTHE PETITIONEREXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO. ITBA/AST/S/156/2022-23/1048180834(1) DATED 22-12-2022 ISSUED FOR THE YEAR 2021-22 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23-02-2022 IN WPC NO 6109 OF 2022
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.