The Pr. Commisioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. M/S Jindal Steel And Power Limited
High Court
29 Aug 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Pr. Commisioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. M/S Jindal Steel And Power Limited
Date of order
29 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
2008-200
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commisioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. M/S Jindal Steel And Power Limited, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH)
107
ITA No. 129 of 2019 (O&M)Date of Decision : 29.08.2019
The Pr. Commisioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon
... Appellant
Versus
M/s Jindal Steel and Power Limited
wee -RESpONdent
CQOQRAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Tajender K.Joshi, Senior Standing Counselfor the appellant.
AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL)
This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 (for short 'the Act') against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Delhi Benches "Friday-D" New Delhi in StayApplication No.340/Del/2018 (arising out of ITA No. 2403/Del/2017) dated18 (205 2018 for the Assessment Year 2008-200
At the very outset, counsel for the appellant-revenue has veryfairly accepted that the issue is covered against the Revenue by the DivisionBench judgment of this Court in ITA No. 78 of 2019 titled asThe PrincipalCommissioner ofIncome Tax, Gurgaon Versus M/s Mitsubishi ElectricAutomotive Indsia Pvt. Ltd., Manesar, Gurgaon,decided on 16.05.2019.
ITA No. 129 of 2019 (O&M)
Dismissed in the same terms|
Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending CM, if any,
also stands disposed of,
29.08 2019pooja SainiWhether speaking/reasoned?Whether reportable?
(AJAY TEWARIT )JUDGE( HARNARESH SINGH GILL )JUDGEVes/NoVes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.