The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Aurangabad v. Anand Omprakash Pahade
High Court
14 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Aurangabad v. Anand Omprakash Pahade
Date of order
14 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Aurangabad v. Anand Omprakash Pahade, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 ca 27.20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 27 OF 2020ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 24 OF 2017
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Aurangabad
.. Applicant
Versus
Anand Omprakash Pahade
.. Respondent
Shri Alok M. Sharma, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM :S. V. GANGAPURWALA ANDSHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE :14TH FEBRURY 2020.
FINAL ORDER :
.We have heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
2.Though the respondent is served, none appears for therespondent.
3.Mr. Sharma, the learned counsel for the applicant submitsthat, due to miss communication between the department andthe learned advocate, the appeal was withdrawn, however,subsequently letter dated 24[th] September, 2019 received from thedepartment could not be noticed that the appeal cannot bewithdrawn in view of Circular dated 20[th] August, 2018.
2 ca 27.20
4.We feel that there was bonafide mistake. In the light ofthat, the order dated 11.12.2019 passed in Income Tax AppealNo. 44 of 2019 is recalled and Income Tax appeal No. 44 of 2019is restored to its original position.
5.The civil application is disposed of.
[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/Feb. 20
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue