Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Au...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Aurangabad v. M/S. Rajuri Steels Pvt. Ltd., Jalna

High Court 21 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

21 Feb 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Aurangabad v. M/S. Rajuri Steels Pvt. Ltd., Jalna, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2117 OF 2020IN ITA/27/2016 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, AURANGABAD..APPLICANT VERSUS M/S. RAJURI STEELS PVT. LTD., JALNA ..RESPONDENT …Mr. Alok M. Sharma, Advocate for the Applicant. … CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATED : 21[st] FEBRUARY, 2020. PER COURT:- 1.We have heard the learned counsel for theapplicant. 2.Though the respondent is served, noneappears for the respondent. 3.Mr. Sharma, the learned counsel for theapplicant submits that, due to communication gapbetween the department and the learned advocate,the appeal was withdrawn. Letter dated 20thSeptember, 2019 received from the department couldnot be noticed. The appeal cannot be withdrawn inview of Circular dated 20th August, 2018. 4.We feel that there was bonafide mistake.In the light of that, the order dated 12.12.2019passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 27 of 2016 isrecalled and Income Tax appeal No. 27 of 2016 isrestored to its original position. 5.The civil application is disposed of (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/February-2020

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.