Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – v....

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – v. Rishikesh Pathare

High Court 13 Oct 2023 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

13 Oct 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – v. Rishikesh Pathare, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 ca 3782.23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3782 OF 2023ININCOME TAX APPEAL STAMP NO. 14856 OF 2020 The Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax – 1, Shankar Seth Road,Swargate, PuneVersusRishikesh Pathare .. Applicant .. Respondent Mrs. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, Advocate for the Applicant. CORAM :MANGESH S. PATIL ANDSHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE :13 OCTOBER 2023. FINAL ORDER : .Heard the learned advocate for the applicant/Department.The respondent has been duly served, but has not causedappearance. 2.Considering the nature of the dispute and the reasonsmentioned in the civil application which have gone withoutdemur, the application is allowed. The delay is condoned.Appeal is restored to its original position subject to condition thatapplicant/department deposits cost of Rs. 2,000/- (Rs. Twothousands only) within a period of two (02) weeks from today.The civil application is disposed of. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.