Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-15, M...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-15, Mumbai – 400 020 v. M/S Wartsila India Limited

High Court 03 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· newos
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-15, Mumbai – 400 020 v. M/S Wartsila India Limited
Date of order
03 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Dismissed

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-15, Mumbai – 400 020 v. M/S Wartsila India Limited, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn butwith a clarification that the question of law is kept open fordecision in an appropriate case.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
suresh 53-ITXA-606.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.606 OF 2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-15, Mumbai – 400 020Vs.M/s Wartsila India Limited .... Appellant .... Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 03, 2018 P.C: 1.In view of the written instructions dated 13-8-2018,copy of which is taken on record and marked β€œX” foridentification, Mr. Suresh Kumar seeks leave to withdraw theappeal. Leave granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn butwith a clarification that the question of law is kept open fordecision in an appropriate case. 2.Refund of Court fee as per rules. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) SureshDigitally signedby Suresh JagdishJagdishSajnawatDate: 2018.09.06Sajnawat12:28:01 +0530 Page 1 of 1
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan