The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-19, Mumbai v. Prakash H. Mehta
High Court
03 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-19, Mumbai v. Prakash H. Mehta
Date of order
03 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-19, Mumbai v. Prakash H. Mehta, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn but with aclarification that the question of law is kept open for decision inan appropriate case.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
suresh
38-ITXA-436.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.436 OF 2016
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-19, MumbaiVs.Prakash H. Mehta
.... Appellant
.... Respondent
Mr. N.A. Kazi with Mr. A.R. Malhotra for the Appellant.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 03, 2018
P.C:
1.In view of the written instructions dated 27-7-2018,copy of which is taken on record and marked “X” foridentification, Mr. Kazi seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.Leave granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn but with aclarification that the question of law is kept open for decision inan appropriate case.
2.Refund of Court fee as per rules.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue