The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Aurangabad v. M/S Piyush Enterprises, Aurangabad
High Court
11 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Aurangabad v. M/S Piyush Enterprises, Aurangabad
Date of order
11 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2, Aurangabad v. M/S Piyush Enterprises, Aurangabad, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.In view of aforesaid, tax appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 33 OF 2019
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – 2,AURANGABADVERSUS
M/S PIYUSH ENTERPRISES, AURANGABAD.
...
Mr. Alok Sharma, senior standing counsel for appellant.
...
CORAM :SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ANDABHAY AHUJA, JJ.DATE :11[th] March 2021.
PER COURT :-
1.Learned counsel appearing for the appellanttenders across a copy of written instructions pursuant toCBDT’s Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8[th] August, 2019 forwithdrawal of the tax appeal and seeks leave to withdraw thetax appeal.
2.Leave granted.
3.In view of aforesaid, tax appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn.
4.Court fees be refunded as per rules.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
VD_Dhirde
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue