The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Aurangabad v. M/S Tapadia And Kasliwal Associates, Aurangabad
High Court
20 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Aurangabad v. M/S Tapadia And Kasliwal Associates, Aurangabad
Date of order
20 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Aurangabad v. M/S Tapadia And Kasliwal Associates, Aurangabad, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
913 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.63 OF 2016
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, AURANGABADVERSUSM/S TAPADIA AND KASLIWAL ASSOCIATES, AURANGABAD...
Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.Mr. Anil Bajaj, Advocate for respondent.
...
ORDER:-
1.Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the appellanttenders across a copy of letter dated 15.01.2021, which ismarked ‘X’ for identifcation, referring to that DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax has given instructions towithdraw the matter pursuant to circular no. 17/2019, dated8[th] August 2019 read with CBDT’s circular no. 03/2018, dated11.07.2018.
2.In view of aforesaid, learned counsel for appellant,seeks leave to withdraw and accordingly the Income TaxAppeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Refund the court fees asper rules.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue