The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Aurangabadversusanurag Radheshyam Attal v. Gangapurwala
High Court
21 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Aurangabadversusanurag Radheshyam Attal v. Gangapurwala
Date of order
21 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Aurangabadversusanurag Radheshyam Attal v. Gangapurwala, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 ita 101.2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
1022 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.101 OF 2016
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, AURANGABADVERSUSANURAG RADHESHYAM ATTAL
...Standing Counsel for Appellant: Mr. Alok SharmaAdvocate for Respondent/Sole: Mr. S. P. Shah...
CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. G. DIGE,JJ.
DATE:21[st] JANUARY, 2022
PER COURT:
1.Mr. Sharma, learned Counsel for the
Appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to
withdraw the Appeal in view of Circular
No. 17/2019.
2.In view of that, Income Tax Appeal isdisposed of as withdrawn. The Court Fees as perRules be refunded.
[S. G. DIGE, J.]
[S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue