Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Ch...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. Appellan

High Court 26 Aug 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. Appellan
Date of order
26 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. Appellan, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH 237 ITA-86-2017 (O&M)Date of Decision: 26.08.2019 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh Versus ...... Appellan The Ropar District Cooperative Milk Producers Union (2) ....... RespondentITA -96-2017 (O&M) The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh Versus ...... Appellan The Ropar District Cooperative Milk Producers Union Ltd. (GB ....... RespondentITA -70-2018 (O&M) The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh Versus ...... Appellan The Ropar District Cooperative Milk Producers Union Ltd, (4) ....... RespondentITA -199-2018 (O&M) The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh Versus ..... Appellant The Ropar District Cooperative Milk Producers Union (<5 ....... RespondentITA -251-2018 (O&M) The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh ..... Appellant Versus The Ropar District Cooperative Milk Producers Union ....... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present:Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. M.R.Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. AJAY TEWARI, J (ORAL) 1]Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue has very fairly statedthat since the tax effect involved is less than=a1 Crore, he has instructionsto withdraw the present appeals in view of Circular dated 17/2019 dated08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi.However, he has prayed that liberty be granted to revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal(s) in case something survives therein. 2 Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Further thelegal issue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated inan appropriate case, 3,Since the main case has been disposed of, the pending CM, if any,also stands disposed of, (AJAY TEWARITJUDGE_ (HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE(| 26.08.2019pooja sainiWhether speaking/reasoned : Yes/NoWhether reportable: Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan