Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Ch...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. M/S Jupiter Aqua Line Pvt Ltd

High Court 25 Feb 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. M/S Jupiter Aqua Line Pvt Ltd
Date of order
25 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. M/S Jupiter Aqua Line Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether speaking/ reasonedYes/No2.

Decision: 2 In the circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed in same termsas in ITA No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

109IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH he f[TTA-386-2019DECIDED ON:FEBRUARY 25, 2020 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, CHANDIGARH VERSUS APPELLANT M/S JUPITER AQUA LINE PVT LTD RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present:Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate forMs. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counselfor the appellant. AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral): !!!! 1]Learned counsel for the appellant has fairly admits that thepresent appeal is covered against the revenue by the decision of this Court inITA No. 322 of 2016 titled asPrincipal Commissioner of Income TaxFf,Chandigarh_vs. M/s Vardhman_Chemtech_Private_Ltd., Chandigarh,decided on 28 082018 and the same be dismissed in same terms. 2 In the circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed in same termsas in ITA No. 322 of JO16. IAJAY TEWARI]JUDGE JIAVNEESH JHINGANJUDGE FEBRUARY 25, 2020sham1. Whether speaking/ reasonedYes/No2. Whether reportableYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan