The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nashik v. Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Jamner
High Court
17 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nashik v. Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Jamner
Date of order
17 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nashik v. Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Jamner, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 70 OF 2015WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2015
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, NASHIKVERSUSAGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE, JAMNER
Mr.Alok M. Sharma, Advocate for the appellantMr.Swapnil S. Dargad, Advocate h/f Mr. S.G.Chapalgaonkar,Advocate for respondent
P.C. :-
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.DATED :17.07.2018
.Heard Mr. Sharma, learned counsel appearing forthe appellant.
2.Mr. Sharma, learned counsel in his usualfairness invited our attention to Circular No.3/2018 andsubmitted policy reflected in the circular. Our attentionwas also invited to paragraph 2 and 3 then paragraph 12and 13 of the said circular. The circular is issued insuper session to the earlier circular in particularlyCircular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015. The copy of thecircular is taken on record and marked as “X” foridentification purpose.
3.In view of the circular No.3/2018 issued by theCentral Board Direct Taxes these appeals are not pressedby the appellant. The appeals are not pressed anddisposed of accordingly.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.]
VishalK/ita70.15
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.